I like the idea technologies are not just Ipods and GPS. I like that engineering can be craftsmanship on a lego level rather than something futuristic. Having no experience of engineering, I have made it into something much larger and scarier in my mind, something I could never comprehend or lend a hand to. I did not think I could see its real products in my life because I thought it was so abstract that it existed somewhere else, rather than the bridges I walk across or the lamp I turn on. I only saw the manufacturing of it, the workers building the bridges and not beyond it.
Then going to Cal Poly, where the word engineering carries weight, it MEANS something big and intelligent, that thing became scarier in my mind. As important as engineers are in this world we live in, they are not the only important part, everyone is important. Anything anyone contributes is important. That is not a value equally shared, and a sentiment I do not feel here, especially being an Ethnic Studies student.
For my research, I am excited to pursue the realm of often left out technologies and innovations that are invented by indigenous societies. Indigenous knowledge are important. Along this avenue, it is interesting to see what “the other” has imposed on the "lacking", on those “in need” because their economies are different or their societies are not the same as The West. It is not OK for someone to tell someone else what they need and what will solve all their problems. That is not their right or responsibility.
I understand, however, how the line of overbearing imposition is quite different than helping out a neighbor. It might be the process of introducing a new technology to a “different” society that truly exemplifies the rightness or wrongness. It is also important to understand how a product will affect the land and people, for these very reasons, a technology may not be innovative at all, or helpful in the least.
I would also like to find an invention or tool or piece of technology that does not exist in our “industrialized world”, but one that should be adopted to better our world. Such a thing exists and The West would most certainly benefit from different perspectives and ways of knowing than what has traditionally been done.
My research is in its beginning stages. I have been sifting through various ideas and settled on this topic as something I am extremely interested in.
For instance, I found this great article to work off of: “Designing Agricultural Technology for African Women Farmers: Lessons from 25 Years of Experience” by Cheryl R. Doss. This article clearly identifies the role gender plays in a social organization and how agriculture production is affected by social order. Thus any new technologies greatly affect production practices and culture.
In class, we have thus far reflected on the ways professional engineering has progressed in France and Britain. Reflecting on my own about American engineering, the formation has been crafted by efficiency and uniformity, Saving Money and Time! However, Doss asserts something quite different for Africa that would not fit into the American version of engineering: “Because of the heterogeneity across Africa, it is difficult to prescribe specific universal remedies or even appropriate remedies for a specific region or country . . . the factors that should be taken into consideration when developing technologies,so that women benefit rather than being disadvantaged. Although we cannot simply take lessons from one part of Africa and apply them directly to another place, we can identify the factors that encourage or limit the adoptions of new technology and affect how the benefits and costs will be distributed within households and communities” (2).
I will further be examining the role globalization has played in the process of the production of indigenous knowledge and how they are often shut out. For instance, this research was conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa regarding Rain Water Harvesting and expresses that although rain water harvesting has been around for thousands of years, indigenous knowledge are often disregarded. Potential is recognized but the authors of “Indigenous knowledge as support tool in rainwater harvesting” assert that indigenous knowledge “remains a neglected resource . . . for the lack of guidelines for recording and applying” the knowledge (2).
I am going to further pursue the research I have presented. Although limited, I am going to find ways indigenous societies around the world, most particular in Africa, have created technologies and perhaps some that should be adopted in the United States.
I think this is an extremely interesting research topic. You bring up some cool topics. For one, I think that your unorthodox (at least with respect to present-day American terms) definition of engineering is fun to think about and ties in really well with our first week of discussion and the concept of "people who define problems differently." It would be interesting to see how indigenous peoples, in Africa or otherwise, define both their problems and solutions differently and in ways that we in America might not even be capable of considering.
ReplyDeleteI do have to admit that I am also guilty of thinking of engineering and technology for the most part as being located at the cusp of our understanding: at the threshold of science and innovation. But I agree that this, in many parts of our world, is inaccurate. We have to realize that other places of the world do no necessarily have the same day-to-day life as we do, and therefore would not "engineer" in ways we might think obvious. Or even simply that the fact that the industrialized world could negatively influence other (a foreign thought to most of us).
I also think that research on this topic would result in a decent amount of information, but even if it didn't, even a few examples would provide you with enough context to have a substantial discussion/presentation.
Mandy, I think it is a great idea to look at indigenous societies and technology. I agree with you that it is important to look at the “other” and really listen to the voices that are not normally heard. I think that even technology and science has a power structure to it; those who are seen as “technologically advanced” have the power to decide what is good and what is bad, or what is right and what is wrong. It is easy for those in power to judge others and be the one who points out the flaws of others. I also feel that it is important to hear how other countries uses technology and how well it works for the people. Nobody else should have a say except for those countries’ people as to how good or bad their use of technology is. And it seems like you are going to look at gender roles as well? Will you then divide it up for technology that women use and technology men use in the different indigenous societies that you will be studying? I think that would be interesting to see how different technology can be used for different roles that genders perform.
ReplyDeleteMandy, great questions, and many different potential directions! If you pursue rainwater harvesting (in particular), there may be a significant opportunity for you to collaborate (or work in parallel) with Billy McVicker, who I believe is doing his research project on water cisterns in Malta. As you continue to work on the project, it may be useful to identify your primary question and/or location.
ReplyDeleteFor example, one of your questions appears to be "What counts as technology?" You may want to look at the work of Autumn Stanley (Mothers and Daughters of Invention) here on the history of women and technological development.
Another question appears to be, "Does technological development mean progress? And for whom? And how do we decide?" Richard Sclove's Democracy and Technology may be useful here.
Another (related question) appears to be "What are different potential models of technological development?" You also have "In what way have indigenous technologies impacted the 'Western' world?"
Lots of good stuff - you may want have a look at Science & Technology in a Multicultural World (by David Hess) in which he argues that we should also think of Western s/t as indigenous s/t. Another potential focus might be bioprospecting/biopiracy.
I look forward to seeing where you go with this.
Additionally - have a look at The Slow Race by Leach & Scoones, which focused on technology and development (including in Sub-Saharan Africa). (We read part of it in ES/WGS 350.) http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/theslowrace
ReplyDelete