Showing posts with label Eastern. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eastern. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

ReWired: Asian/TechnoScience/Area Studies - Call for Participation

THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HUMANITIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE presents
in conjunction with the Center for Chinese Studies at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa 
 
SEMINAR IN EXPERIMENTAL CRITICAL THEORY (SECT VII)

ReWired:
Asian/TechnoScience/Area Studies

August 1-10, 2011 at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa

The Seminar will address how technoscientific knowledge-systems are re-ordered when geo-political formations shift.
   You "don't invent the future," John Seely Brown famously noted - "you unleash it by leveraging the global community mind."
    Today the fastest expansion of technoscientific knowledge production and urban development is occurring across multiple Asian sites in the throes of techno-economic boom. Seely Brown's observation, made in conversation with Paul Duguid, was meant to characterize late 20th century knowledge institutions and sites of technological production in the US. It nevertheless uncannily predicts the radical de-centering of global technological futures in the 21st century, not least in the Asian context.
    The 2011 Seminar in Experimental Critical Theory (SECT VII) seeks to elucidate these rapidly transforming landscapes of knowledge production, the shaping of contemporary knowledge institutions, their impact on social life in intense urban contexts, and this century's techno-scientific horizons of possibility. Comprehending these movements, forces, and structures requires integrating deep understandings of history and politics represented by Asian and critical Area Studies with emergent work on the transnational dynamics of science and technology as well as on market economies and their modes of governance.
    The social life of information emerges in particular kinds of institutional structures and historical conditions. It refracts, reflects and embeds larger social forces and modes of production, extending some ideas and undercutting others. What are the impacts and influences of varying social arrangements and socio-technical assumptions on each other, and on learning practices and institutions? What sorts of networks are conducive to knowledge making now? How do the shapes and impacts of open source knowledge arrangements, for example, compare with proprietary ones?  What do these recent formations and experiences tell us about the knowledge institutions and production arrangements to come?
    Envisioning the technological future has too often seemed the province of western technologists. Recent media and economic analyses accurately identify the importance of new technological practices in contemporary Asia. Nevertheless, they often reduce complex historical processes to simplistic narratives: about the invisible hand of technoscience, or about the formerly ignorant attaining progress and becoming newly-empowered individuals and societies. The dominant questions that follow are equally misleading: Does information technology liberate developing countries from their legacy of poverty? Is Asian science as good as western science? Are women empowered by the digital revolution?
    This way of viewing things presumes Asian modernities to be marked by lack and belatedness. It views technology as the sole or dominant driver of social, economic, political and cultural change. It sees scientific ability as inherent to certain kinds of peoples. And it highlights the Asian "tiger "and "dragon" as representative of particular techno-political threats to US dominance.
Sect VII--ReWired: Asian/TechnoScience/Area Studies--will seek a more nuanced understanding of these processes by engaging a diverse set of critical accounts of science and technology as they apply to the historical conditions of these developments in Asia. Computing practices, unlike older forms of technoscience from physics and mathematics to botany and forestry, are increasingly recognized as emerging via networks shaped by, in, and across the formerly "underdeveloped" world, including India, China, South Korea and Taiwan. The Seminar will experiment with juxtaposing histories of "older" sciences with the contemporary practices of "digital natives;" integrating critical knowledge of states, science, and social movements from the histories and social sciences of Asia; engaging studies of cultural production in Asian contexts; and broadening studies of peer-to-peer creative and community-based practices generated by the transnational digital sphere.
Asia has long been part of global flows of knowledge, commodities, and culture, all too readily overlooked in conventional accounts of its "emerging" development. Accordingly, SECT VII will avoid euphoric claims of radical novelty, as well as assumptions of simple continuity with colonial pasts. We approach Asia's disparate hybrid modernities without postulating a unifying Asian modernity, seeking to understand their various, often contradictory but productive discourses of science, technology, digital revolution, political economy, community, nation, and identity.   
    In this experimental critical space, SECT VII will seek to nurture, across disciplinary and regional borders, discussions of the kind that have not flourished within the more established Area Studies or disciplinary paradigms. The seminar space will be one of practical invention and intellectual innovation. We find continuities with other ongoing projects: most notably, the Digital Media Learning initiative of the UCHRI, and the HASTAC program, that aim to create "a generation of scholars equally at ease with current (which is also to say historical) knowledge in the humanities, arts, and social sciences, on the one hand, and with the technological, scientific, and engineering knowledge on the other, with a view to facilitating development of new discoveries and new relations between currently available knowledge sources, in order to digitally prompt new bodies of important knowledge." SECT VII similarly builds on the Poor Theory Manifesto developed out of UC Irvine's Critical Theory Institute that sees the past, present, and future as mutually constitutive and "heterotemporal", attending to the "unsystematic" and undisciplined "practices of the everyday."

SECT VII: ReWired is thus concerned with the large questions of infrastructure and information, social technology and technoscience, institutions of knowledge making and learning. It will be of particular interest to those concerned with Science and Technology Studies, Asian Studies, Global Studies, Digital Media, and their interface. And it will appeal to those drawn to theoretical modesty, tinkering and improvisation, appropriation and recombinatorial experimentation, to relationalities and rearticulations.

Dates: August 1-10, 2011
Location: University of Hawai'i at Mānoa

Instructional faculty:
Itty Abraham, University of Texas
Ivan da Costa Marques, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Wendy Chun, Brown University
Joe Dumit, UC Davis
Roger Hart, University of Texas
Cori Hayden, UC Berkeley
Tim Lenoir, Duke University
Kavita Philip, UC Irvine
Achal Prabhala, Wikimedia Foundation
Sha Xin Wei, Concordia University, Montreal
Nishant Shah, Center for Internet and Society
Lucy Suchman, Lancaster University
Siva Vaidhyanathan, University of Virginia
Kath Weston, University of Virginia

Application Fee: $20
Registration Fee: $1250
Registration fee includes shared housing, instruction, and some meals. 
Applicants are urged to seek funding from their home institutions. A very limited number of scholarships may be available to full time registered students.
Presented by the University of California Humanities Research Institute and the Center for Chinese Studies at the University of Hawai'i, Mānoa. For additional information, please visit http://www.uchri.org/sect.php or contact us at sect@hri.uci.edu or 949-824-8900.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Reasearch Progress Report 1: Thailand & Technological Development

Research Progress Report #1
For this report, I am planning to focus on the effect of engineering (and specifically, “appropriate technology”) in Thailand. I traveled abroad with the Cal Poly program and did an independent study project with a partner to develop a means of cleaning up the drinking water filtration system. Many Thai citizens collect the water they drink for the entire year during their rainy season from March-June. The water is collected off their roofs, and many currently have it flow directly into the storage tank. This poses a problem because the debris that is now present in the tank can take hours to settle. Our engineering challenge was to develop a means of making a purification system that would not be overly bulky, it had to hold enough water to effectively get the debris out (estimated to take the first 60 liters), and it had to be of reasonably low cost. After deliberating on a solution, we came up with a tank that the water (and debris) would flow into initially. Once the water filled to the top of this initial tank, it would automatically divert into the storage tank, and be safe for immediate drinking. Having worked with the people to see what they needed, we were able to effectively work for a solution, while also working with the current filtration system they had, which consisted of a mesh net to catch the larger debris before it flowed into the main storage tank.

In this report, I would like to focus on the types of engineering projects going on in Thailand. I’d like to investigate engineering practices mainly in the smaller villages. I have researched projects done by Engineers Without Borders (EWB), and I am looking to do more research on Thai-company based engineering work. My proposed thesis I am focusing on is: How is the western world looking to the eastern world with respect to engineering and technology, and how can they help foster a more effective and appropriate engineering style for the systems already in place in the other country? If anyone has suggestions on how I can improve or better focus my thesis, I would love to hear them!

My goal in this paper will be to show how engineering done in the western world (mostly relating to the US), is not directly applicable to the life of a Thai person. Having lived there, I have experienced how the day to day interactions of Thais are very different in comparison to those we have here in the United States. My goal is to expose these differences, and hopefully determine an approach to engineering education and its ability to expand its focus to a more global outlook. From the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Journal titled Civil Engineering, there is acknowledgment for the need to alter our view of engineering and how we apply it: “As the trend toward a more global and more knowledge-based society continues, the practice of engineering must be changed, and this change must be accomplished through engineering education reform.” As professional societies like EWB and ASCE move toward a more applicable style of engineering, we may be able to see a heightened value of global engineering and alternatives to expensive building.

I am mainly going to journals found on the Cal Poly Library website, and the aforementioned society pages. I will also be looking into the anti-globalization arguments against the application of appropriate technology. If anyone has more suggestions on where to look, I’d be happy to hear them!

Patricia D. Galloway, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, “The 21st-Century Engineer: A Proposal For Engineering Education Reform”. Engineering Education Reform, Civil Engineering. ASCE. November 2007, Pages: 46-47